Peter Diamandis

The statement acknowledges the potential impact of a technology (deepfakes) and implies a need for awareness and possibly regulation. It does not directly harm anyone with words, but it does reference a sensitive issue involving non-consensual use of a person's likeness, which could be seen as lacking respect for privacy and dignity. The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, nor does it promote understanding, empathy, or compassion regarding the victim of the deepfakes. It does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it acknowledge or correct any mistakes. The statement does not directly use influence for the betterment of society, nor does it uphold the principles of free speech responsibly.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement is neutral in terms of harm, as it does not directly harm anyone with words.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement indirectly references a violation of privacy and dignity by discussing the viral nature of deepfakes involving a specific individual. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion for the individual affected by the deepfakes. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   There is no engagement in constructive criticism or dialogue about the issue at hand.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not demonstrate using influence for the betterment of society, as it does not condemn the creation or distribution of deepfakes. [-1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly, as it does not address the ethical implications of spreading deepfakes. [-1]