The statement is political in nature, expressing support for a state's actions in response to perceived federal inaction. The tone is critical but not inflammatory, and the intent is to comment on a matter of public policy.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but does criticize a policy decision. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion towards the individuals involved in the border situation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not explicitly invite dialogue or constructive criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to influence public opinion on a matter of societal concern, suggesting a betterment of society through state action. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to express a political stance with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.