In reply to:
rowvee
@RLaffan
·
735d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
735d
The statement in question is a response to an accusation of ignorance regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict. The respondent is clarifying that they have not spoken on the topic and is questioning the logic of how their silence can be deemed 'incredible'. The tone is defensive and seeks to address a perceived inaccuracy in the previous statement. The image and the linked article's content are not directly addressed in this statement, so they do not factor into the analysis of this particular response.
- The statement does not cause harm but defends the speaker's position. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to correct a perceived mistake by clarifying the speaker's position on the issue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in dialogue, although it does not directly address the criticism but rather the logic behind it. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.