Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement presents a critical view of the Global Disinformation Index's practices, highlighting a perceived inconsistency between its actions and its mission. The tone is accusatory and suggests wrongdoing on the part of the GDI. The intent is to inform and possibly to provoke scrutiny of the GDI's practices.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather to point out perceived hypocrisy, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the organization's actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement invites dialogue and criticism of the GDI's practices, which is in line with engaging in constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to highlight potential issues in the operation of a public entity, which could be seen as working for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by using the platform to hold a public entity accountable, which is responsible and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.