Mike Johnson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 43

The statement is a firm stance on immigration policy, specifically on the issue of illegal border crossings. The tone is absolute and uncompromising, with a clear intent to advocate for a strict border control policy that tolerates no illegal crossings.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not explicitly intend to do harm, but the absolute nature of the demand for zero tolerance could indirectly contribute to harmful situations for individuals seeking asylum or refuge. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others in a general sense, but the zero-tolerance policy could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those in desperate situations. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards individuals attempting to cross the border illegally, often out of desperation. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather presents an ultimatum that does not invite discussion or consideration of differing viewpoints. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to use influence to shape immigration policy, which could be seen as an attempt to better society from the perspective of the speaker. However, the lack of empathy and understanding may not align with the betterment of society as a whole.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech but may lack responsibility and integrity if it does not consider the complex humanitarian issues at play. [-1]