In reply to:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
·
737d
The statement 'This is a direct violation of the Nuremberg Code' is a critical response to a new FDA ruling. The tone is serious and the intent is to express concern over potential ethical issues with the ruling. The content references the Nuremberg Code, which sets ethical standards for human experimentation.
- The statement does not intend to harm but to raise an ethical concern. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not clearly invite constructive dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence for the betterment of society by highlighting potential ethical issues. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to raise a serious concern responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.