Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement is critical of the government's response to the railroad workers' strike and the East Palestine derailment. It implies that the government's actions were not in the best interest of the workers or public safety. The tone is accusatory and suggests a failure of leadership and empathy for the affected workers and community. The content is politically charged and touches upon issues of workers' rights, public safety, and government accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement is critical but does not appear to cause harm with words. It raises concerns about safety and workers' rights.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the actions of public figures and entities.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites dialogue about the government's response to the strike and derailment, although it does so in a confrontational manner.聽[-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to use influence to highlight perceived injustices and advocate for better conditions, aligning with the betterment of society.聽[+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech to hold public figures accountable, but its accusatory tone may not reflect the most responsible use of the platform.