The statement questions the intent behind a tweet, suggesting that it may be an attempt to provoke anger or to gain attention rather than to contribute constructively to a discussion about social justice. The statement also includes a hashtag that implies the tweet is part of a game of manufactured outrage for personal relevance. The images depict a statue with a beheaded figure and people interacting with a statue near the White House, which are related to the context of the tweet about the treatment of statues and the legal consequences of such actions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but questions the intent behind another's words.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy towards the original tweet's perspective. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement questions the use of influence, implying it may not be for the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement challenges the responsible use of a platform, suggesting the tweet may not be upholding free speech principles with integrity. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.