The statement criticizes 'legacy media' and suggests that they are in a state of disarray due to a loss of trust. It defends the right of a journalist to interview a controversial world leader, advocating for transparency and referencing historical journalistic practices. The tone is critical of the media and supportive of the journalist's actions.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm but is critical of the media, which could be seen as negative by some.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, as it does not engage in personal attacks.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The call for transparency aligns with promoting understanding, although the claim of 'lies and propaganda' could hinder constructive dialogue.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement encourages the use of influence for transparency, which could be seen as betterment of society.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principle of free speech by defending the journalist's right to interview a world leader.
[+1]