FreudianSlippers
@FreudianFlipper
·
722d
The statement is part of a discussion regarding the decision-making process behind banning a sitting President from Twitter. It is informational and analytical, without any apparent intent to harm, disrespect, or incite negativity. The tone is neutral and focused on sharing findings from an investigation.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not reveal private information or engage in harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is neutral and does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement contributes to a dialogue about a disagreement (the banning of a President from Twitter) in a constructive manner. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to inform the public, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing to a discussion on a public platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.