Reposted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr
The statement criticizes 'legacy media' and suggests that they have been spreading 'lies and propaganda,' which is a strong accusation that could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. It defends Tucker Carlson's right to interview Vladimir Putin, advocating for transparency and the journalistic practice of interviewing world leaders. The tone is confrontational towards the media and supportive of the interview taking place.
- The statement may cause harm by accusing the media of lying without providing evidence, which could undermine trust in journalism. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by not engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The call for transparency promotes understanding, but the confrontational tone may not foster empathy or compassion.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement encourages the use of influence for what the speaker believes is the betterment of society by advocating for transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by defending Carlson's right to interview Putin, but the accusation against the media could be seen as irresponsible if unsubstantiated.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.