Matt Taibbi

The statement suggests that the Biden Administration is engaging in censorship by funding research on misinformation, which it alleges is a cover for government censorship demands. The tone is accusatory and implies wrongdoing by the administration and the entities mentioned. The image provided is a letter from a congressional committee requesting information about the National Science Foundation's role in content moderation, which adds context to the statement but does not substantiate the claims made in the statement.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified accusations, which might lead to public distrust in government institutions and research entities. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the dignity of the entities involved, as it accuses them of unethical behavior without providing concrete evidence. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging the complexity of the issue of misinformation and content moderation. [-1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not acknowledge the possibility of error or the complexity of the issue, which could be misleading and does not contribute to the betterment of society. [-1]