The statement critiques the media's role in determining access to power and suggests that it should be the public's decision. The tone is assertive and challenges the status quo. It is a response to a comment labeling a media figure as a propagandist.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather to assert a viewpoint on media influence. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in dialogue but could be seen as lacking constructiveness due to its confrontational nature.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to advocate for public empowerment in decision-making. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a dissenting opinion on media practices. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.