The statement expresses a commitment to combat perceived corruption in media and government, suggesting a belief that the public has been misled. It also thanks two individuals, presumably for their support or contributions to this cause. The tone is serious and implies a call to action or advocacy. The image shows a person, likely in a podcast or interview setting, but without additional context, it's not clear how the image relates to the statement.
- The statement promotes action against corruption, which aligns with doing no harm as it seeks to address wrongdoing. However, without evidence, such claims could potentially spread misinformation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not directly disrespect the privacy and dignity of others, but it does imply that certain entities are corrupt without providing specifics, which could be seen as a general accusation without substantiation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement encourages a form of dialogue by acknowledging support from others, but it does not explicitly invite constructive criticism or dialogue with those who may disagree.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a cause, but without clear evidence, it's uncertain whether this is for the betterment of society or could potentially lead to divisiveness.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.