Cathy Young 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱
@CathyYoung63
·
721d
The statement is part of a conversation about political commentary and media narratives. The tone is defensive and sarcastic, responding to an accusation of promoting Kremlin narratives by highlighting support for a dissenting Russian author.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but uses sarcasm which can be perceived as aggressive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement attempts to engage in dialogue but the sarcasm may hinder constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implies a use of influence to support free speech and dissent, which could be for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement defends the use of the platform against accusations of irresponsible behavior, but the sarcasm may not fully uphold integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.