The statement critiques the clarity of reporting on a survey about trans individuals' life satisfaction post-transition. It suggests that if the reporting is not clear and straightforward, it may serve a purpose other than informing the reader. The tone is critical but not disrespectful or harmful.
- The statement does not intend to harm but to critique the clarity of information presented. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it implies the importance of clear communication for informed understanding.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism about the presentation of survey results and dialogue about the interpretation of data. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.