In reply to:
The statement criticizes the concept of 'platforming' as a form of censorship and defends the public's right to hear different perspectives and form their own opinions. It implies that authorities may be trying to control the narrative by limiting access to certain individuals or ideas. The tone is critical of the pundits and suggests a defense of free speech and open discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by advocating for the public's access to a range of ideas and perspectives. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement encourages the use of influence for the betterment of society by supporting the principle of free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and responsible use of platforms. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.