Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement is assertive and urgent, calling for immediate action to prevent violence. It uses strong language ('genocide on steroids') to describe the potential invasion and implies a moral imperative for the US to intervene ('The US must stop the massacre'). The tone is one of condemnation and advocacy for peace.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, particularly the term 'genocide on steroids'. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement advocates for the cessation of violence and promotes understanding of the potential consequences of the invasion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather issues a demand for action, which may not invite open conversation. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to use influence to prevent violence and promote peace, aligning with the betterment of society. [+1]