Matt Taibbi

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 40
2/14/2024, 2:17:38 AM
X
In reply to:
#MLBTrump#UltraMAGA They plan to end humanity🇺🇸
@enlightnup
·
712d
@1111letsgo1111 @chiIIum @TheLastRefuge2 @shellenberger @mtaibbi Taibbi
#MLBTrump#UltraMAGA They plan to end humanity🇺🇸
@enlightnup
·
712d
@1111letsgo1111 @chiIIum @TheLastRefuge2 @shellenberger @mtaibbi And f’g Taibi can gth!
John 🇺🇸
@1111letsgo1111
·
712d
@chiIIum @TheLastRefuge2 @shellenberger @mtaibbi He was told when to drop the info. And, i don't think he tells a better story than you or the rest of the citizen journos and anons. His style is typical mainstream journalist with a lot of excess words.
𝕔hi𝓁𝓁iຖ໐iˢ
@chiIIum
·
712d
@TheLastRefuge2 @shellenberger @mtaibbi Only ONE thing has changed from years ago until now, and that’s the fact people are making money off of other people’s time and effort (which they provided for free). I’m not interested in anything some controlled information dropper has to spill.
He literally said we didn’t…
TheLastRefuge
@TheLastRefuge2
·
712d
Yo, @shellenberger ! Get over yourself. Ask @mtaibbi , he'll tell ya... We been knew this years ago!
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
713d
There are people in the replies suggesting that "we already knew this."

No, we didn't. And no, you didn't. Only a tiny number of people knew about this until now.

And, as we note in our story, "If the top-secret documents exist proving these charges, they are potentially…

The statement in question is a part of a Twitter conversation chain that appears to be discussing the timing and style of information release by a journalist. The tone seems to be critical but not overtly harmful or disrespectful. It's a critique of journalistic practices rather than a personal attack.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by questioning the timing and narrative style of a journalist's work. It does not seem to be disrespectful or harmful, but rather a part of a dialogue about journalistic practices. [+1]