Sergio Vengeance 🇺🇲🎮🤘
@SergioVengeance
·
712d
The statement expresses concern about the involvement of various government agencies in content-flagging operations on social media platforms, suggesting that such activities are inappropriate. The tone is critical and implies a defense of free speech and a call for transparency and accountability in government actions related to online speech.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by government monitoring of online speech, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- While the statement is critical, it does not disrespect the privacy or dignity of others, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement encourages a dialogue about the role of government agencies in online platforms, promoting understanding and potentially empathy for those concerned about free speech. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to discuss the betterment of society by questioning the appropriateness of government involvement in online speech monitoring. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and responsible use of platforms, advocating for integrity in how government agencies interact with social media. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.