The statement critiques the translation of official language into journalistic terms, suggesting a 'scam' where terms like 'disinfo' and 'disinformation' are added by journalists, potentially misleading the public. The tone is critical and implies a lack of integrity in journalism relating to the handling of official statements on election interference and information operations.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but criticizes the potential spread of misinformation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on critique. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not appear to seek constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to correct public misconceptions, which could be seen as bettering society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement calls for responsible use of platforms, implying that journalists have not used their platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.