The statement appears to express frustration over perceived suppression of free speech on a social media platform. The tone is accusatory and implies that the individual mentioned is not upholding the principles of free speech they are associated with. The content specifically addresses the visibility of a user's posts on the platform.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but expresses discontent in a non-harmful way. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the issue rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather makes an accusation without seeking a conversation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by calling out perceived suppression, but it could be seen as not using the platform with complete integrity due to the accusatory tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.