The statement in question is part of a conversation regarding the conditions under which a journalist agreed to report a story, specifically the 'Twitter Files'. The tone of the statement is explanatory and defensive, as the journalist is responding to an accusation of doing 'PR work for free' and is clarifying the conditions of their reporting. The content of the statement is focused on the professional arrangement between the journalist and the platform on which they agreed to break the story first. The image attached to the conversation provides context to the journalist's experience and the conditions they agreed to for covering the story.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does no harm as it is a factual clarification of the journalist's professional arrangement.
[+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not disclosing sensitive information or engaging in personal attacks.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement promotes understanding by explaining the conditions of the reporting arrangement to the audience.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The journalist uses their influence to clarify the situation and maintain professional integrity.
[+1]