The statement 'My motivation then and now was the story, which was and is worth this other silliness a million times over.' appears to be a defense of the speaker's actions or focus on journalistic integrity over the 'silliness' of social media dynamics. The tone is dismissive of the surrounding controversy, emphasizing the importance of the 'story' over the online disputes. The statement does not directly engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, nor does it violate the privacy and dignity of others. It promotes the speaker's dedication to their work and indirectly encourages understanding of their perspective. The statement does not directly engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, acknowledge mistakes, or use influence for societal betterment. It does, however, imply a commitment to free speech and journalistic integrity.
- The statement does no harm as it focuses on the importance of the story over the controversy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by emphasizing the value of the story being told. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While not engaging in direct dialogue, the statement maintains a focus on the importance of the story, which can be seen as an attempt to steer the conversation back to constructive topics.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and journalistic integrity by emphasizing the importance of the story over social media dynamics. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.