The statement appears to be part of a conversation or debate regarding the professional use of Twitter by reporters who are also contributors to Substack. The speaker is addressing concerns about a dispute between an individual and Substack, and how it has affected their ability to use Twitter for professional purposes. The image attached shows a text conversation that seems to be related to the issue at hand, discussing the sharing of articles on Twitter and the implications for professional marketing and perception of employment. The tone is informative and seems to be aimed at clarifying a situation rather than attacking or demeaning any party involved.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not reveal sensitive personal information or engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement contributes to a constructive dialogue about the professional use of social media platforms. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The speaker is using their influence to discuss a professional matter, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by fostering open communication about platform policies and their impact on users. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.