Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 46
2/15/2024, 9:18:22 PM
X
In reply to:
BH
@billyhu6
·
605d
@mtaibbi @TxBTC @elonmusk It seems like he felt betrayed, how does his dispute with Substack connect to you, if at all?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
605d
@TxBTC @elonmusk No, the arrangement was very specific and we all adhered to it. All breaking news stories from the Files had to come out on Twitter, past that he didn’t care. Even after the disagreement I never broke that deal. The issue was his dispute with Substack.
Texas₿TC
@TxBTC
·
605d
@mtaibbi @elonmusk Didn't he hook you up with the twitter files thinking you would only post on X?

Outside looking in, it's very obvious he feels you betrayed that agreement.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
605d
Since @elonmusk published parts of these conversations, I might as well include others. I was under a “blanket search ban” at one point and a lot of my 1.9 million followers still don’t see my content.
🌶FranksRedHat
@FranksRedHat
·
605d
@mtaibbi @elonmusk Sorry, are you actually suggesting Elon is deliberately burying your visibility to stop people from seeing what you post?

Any proof of this? Seems like a pretty large scandal for his supposed #1a platform if that is true.

The statement in question is a part of a conversation thread on Twitter discussing a perceived lack of connection between a dispute with Substack and the user involved in the conversation. The tone of the statement is neutral and factual, simply stating that there is no connection. The content does not appear to be harmful, disrespectful, or unconstructive.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it is a neutral clarification. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity by not divulging personal information or engaging in attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement contributes to understanding by clarifying a point of confusion. [+1]
  4. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement is part of a dialogue and does not correct any mistakes as it is a clarification.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence neutrally to clarify a point in a public conversation. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by participating in a public dialogue without misuse. [+1]