Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement appears to be a critical commentary on The New York Times' journalistic priorities, suggesting that the newspaper prioritizes appealing to the emotions and intellect of its readers over traditional journalistic values like accountability. The tone is critical and implies a divergence from what the speaker believes should be the core mission of journalism. The image from Vanity Fair includes a highlighted quote that seems to be the focus of the criticism, indicating that the newspaper aims to produce journalism that 'makes them feel smart'.
- The statement is critical but does not seem to cause harm. It expresses an opinion on journalistic practices. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not target individuals but comments on an organization's approach. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement encourages a discussion about journalistic integrity and priorities, which could lead to constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to hold media accountable, which could be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement challenges the media's use of its platform, questioning whether it is responsible and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.