In reply to:
Mary
@MarySCIL
·
602d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
603d
The statement in question is a response to a query about why the individual continues to use a platform despite expressing negative opinions about it. The individual explains that they have built a following over a decade, which they have used and intend to use for business purposes. The tone is explanatory and justifies the continued use of the platform as a business decision. There is no harmful language, disrespect, or engagement in cyberbullying. The statement is straightforward and does not appear to violate any principles of the oath for public discourse.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is neutral and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is not directly promoting understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is also not detracting from these values.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no criticism or dialogue involved, so this principle is not applicable.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement is factual and does not require correction of mistakes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to explain a business decision, which is a responsible use of influence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.