The statement appears to be promoting a livestream event aimed at refuting a segment by Lesley Stahl on '60 Minutes.' The tone suggests a confrontational approach to correcting what the author perceives as misinformation or a lack of correction by CBS regarding surveillance of Donald Trump's 2016 campaign. The content includes a reference to Chris Christie and links to additional material on the subject.
- The statement seems to be aimed at correcting perceived misinformation, which could be seen as an attempt to do no harm. However, the confrontational tone may not fully align with the principle of doing no harm with words.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is focused on refutation and correction. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement indicates an intent to engage in dialogue, albeit in a critical manner, which aligns with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement's intent to correct misinformation could be seen as using influence for the betterment of society, assuming the corrections are accurate and presented responsibly. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and appears to use the platform to address a public concern responsibly, provided the information shared is accurate and presented with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.