The statement questions the logic behind the alleged connection between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin, suggesting that if such a connection existed, there would not have been a need for separate outreach to Wikileaks. The tone is skeptical and challenges the narrative of a conspiracy. It does not appear to be harmful, disrespectful, or unconstructive, but rather invites consideration of the evidence and logic behind the claims of conspiracy.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather to question and analyze a situation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement invites dialogue and could be seen as an attempt at constructive criticism of a narrative. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by questioning and seeking clarity on a matter of public interest. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.