In reply to:
The statement '@davemacaart What are you implying? Smh' is a response to a tweet suggesting a connection between a journalist's report and the death of a political figure. The tone of the statement is one of disbelief or disapproval, indicated by the abbreviation 'Smh' (shaking my head). The intent seems to be to question the original poster's insinuation or to express skepticism.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but does express disapproval in a non-constructive way. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement questions the original poster but does not engage in a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.