Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 46
2/17/2024, 9:11:25 PM
X
In reply to:
zazazoop
@zazazoop1
·
597d
@mtaibbi @elonmusk The more telling part is you've been glazing this dude and hiding this for a year while he fucked you over. lmao. you showed to be a hack when you wrote the files up to now. get used whore.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
599d
Since @elonmusk published parts of these conversations, I might as well include others. I was under a “blanket search ban” at one point and a lot of my 1.9 million followers still don’t see my content.
🌶FranksRedHat
@FranksRedHat
·
599d
@mtaibbi @elonmusk Sorry, are you actually suggesting Elon is deliberately burying your visibility to stop people from seeing what you post?

Any proof of this? Seems like a pretty large scandal for his supposed #1a platform if that is true.

The initial statement by @zazazoop1 contains harsh language and personal attacks against @mtaibbi, accusing them of being a 'hack' and a 'used whore.' This language is aggressive, disrespectful, and could be considered a form of cyberbullying. The follow-up reply by @zazazoop1, stating 'I wrote about this the day it happened,' is neutral in tone and does not contain any harmful content. However, it is in response to the previous aggressive message, which taints the overall interaction.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The initial message violates the principle of doing no harm with words, as it uses derogatory language. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The message disrespects the dignity of @mtaibbi, which is a violation of their privacy and dignity. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The aggressive language used does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The message does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but instead resorts to name-calling and insults. [-2]