Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement expresses concern for Julian Assange's ability to receive a fair trial in the US, criticizing the government's actions and implying a violation of constitutional amendments. It also suggests that the government is using Assange as an example to deter others from revealing misconduct. The tone is critical and implies a defense of free speech and a fair trial. The linked content seems to be a video or article advocating for awareness about Assange's situation.
- The statement does not intend to harm but to criticize perceived injustices. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of Assange's situation, though it lacks a compassionate tone towards the US government.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue about Assange's trial and the government's actions, but it does so in a confrontational manner.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement seeks to use influence to raise awareness about a societal issue, which could contribute to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to share a perspective on a controversial issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.