David M Friedman
@DavidM_Friedman
·
697d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a political decision related to international law and territorial rights. It expresses disapproval of a policy stance taken by the Biden administration regarding Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and it references historical and legal arguments to support its position.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm but expresses a strong disagreement with a policy decision. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on a legal and historical argument. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of a policy decision without personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to argue for what the speaker believes is the betterment of society, in this case, the rights of the Jewish people to live in certain territories. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech, using the platform to express a viewpoint responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.