The statement appears to be a critique of the current administration's border policies, linking them to negative outcomes, including a specific incident involving a Georgia student. The tone is critical and the intent seems to be to hold the administration accountable for its policies and their consequences.
- The statement implies harm caused by policies, but does not directly do harm with words.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, but mentioning a specific individual's case could be seen as sensitive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of policies, but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to highlight what the author perceives as policy failures, potentially for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.