The statement criticizes the New York Times and describes it as a 'cult,' suggesting a negative view of the newspaper's decisions regarding a Tom Cotton editorial. The linked article's title implies a personal account of facing consequences for actions at the newspaper, suggesting a conflict with the institution's practices.
- The statement uses harsh language ('lunacy,' 'cult') which could be seen as harmful or offensive, especially without context. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses strong language that could polarize rather than bring people together. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While the statement invites dialogue about the New York Times' decisions, the language used ('crazy,' 'far worse') may not foster constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.