Dr Jordan B Peterson
@jordanbpeterson
·
692d
The statement appears to be a response to a conversation about online regulation and harmful content. It references Jordan Peterson's lack of presence on major media platforms and suggests that, regardless of personal opinions, his ideas have a significant following. The statement concludes with an acknowledgment that the speaker can only extend an invitation to dialogue.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather invites discussion. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement recognizes the impact of Peterson's ideas on many people, which could be seen as an attempt to promote understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue despite acknowledging that some may not like Peterson, which aligns with engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By inviting dialogue, the statement could be seen as using influence to encourage a better-informed society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement respects the principles of free speech by acknowledging the right to voice diverse opinions and the importance of dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.