Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement accuses Adam Rubenstein of fabricating a story and praises the investigative work of Hobbes. The tone is accusatory and implies wrongdoing on the part of Rubenstein. The intent seems to be to question the integrity of Rubenstein's actions and to commend Hobbes for uncovering this. The content is a claim about Rubenstein's alleged premeditated actions and the quality of Hobbes' investigation.
- The statement could potentially cause harm to Rubenstein's reputation by accusing him of being an 'evil mastermind' and fabricating a story, which is a serious allegation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Rubenstein, as it labels him with a negative and morally charged term without providing evidence for such a claim. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents an accusation without room for discussion or rebuttal. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement could negatively influence the perception of Rubenstein among readers, which may not be for the betterment of society if the claim is unfounded. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.