The statement criticizes Google Gemini for creating deepfake derogatory histories, implying harm and a lack of respect for the dignity of individuals. The tone is accusatory and concerned with the potential negative impact of the technology. The intent seems to be to raise awareness and possibly to initiate a dialogue about the responsible use of AI technologies.
- The statement points out potential harm caused by the technology, aligning with the principle to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By highlighting the creation of derogatory histories, the statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, condemning actions that would violate this principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement appears to invite dialogue about the issue, which could be seen as an attempt to engage in constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise a concern for the betterment of society by pointing out a potentially harmful technology. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by using the platform to discuss the responsible use of technology with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.