Matt Taibbi

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 35
2/28/2024, 10:37:32 PM
X
In reply to:
hyg9384
@hyg9384
·
581d
@mtaibbi @YouTube I mean its not defamatory, but sort of odd how it tries to shoehorn you into it. You didnt leave RS until years later? The rest of are basically what your enemies say about you, so par for the course otherwise
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
581d
@hyg9384 @YouTube Wow what? What did they say? Smh
hyg9384
@hyg9384
·
581d
@mtaibbi @YouTube I asked the same question and it gave me an answer related to the infamous 'rape on campus' RS article that you weren't involved with? Almost like I had asked for controversies involving RS.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
581d
I Wrote What? Google's AI-Powered Libel Machine

https://www.racket.news/p/i-wrot…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?fe… via @YouTube

The statement is part of a conversation regarding the impact of a controversy on the relationship between an individual and a magazine. The tone is neutral and factual, aiming to clarify the individual's position in relation to the magazine and the controversy mentioned. The statement does not appear to be harmful, disrespectful, or lacking in empathy. It seems to be a part of a constructive dialogue and does not contain any elements of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. The statement also does not reveal any private information, thus respecting privacy and dignity.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement maintains a neutral tone and does not lack empathy. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a constructive dialogue. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no mistake to acknowledge or correct in this context. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not appear to use influence in a harmful way. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly. [+1]