Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement expresses concern about the authenticity of book reviews generated by an AI, suggesting that the AI created fake negative reviews and falsely attributed them to real individuals. The tone is accusatory and implies unethical behavior on the part of the AI or its operators. The image provided shows a list of book reviews with the names of the reviewers and the publications where they supposedly appeared. The bottom of the image includes a disclaimer that the AI may display inaccurate information and advises users to double-check its responses.
- The statement aims to correct what the author perceives as misinformation, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the individuals whose names were allegedly used without their consent, aligning with the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The author is attempting to correct a mistake by highlighting the inaccuracy of the AI-generated content, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement calls for responsible use of AI platforms, aligning with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society and upholding free speech responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.