Matt Taibbi

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 13
2/29/2024, 2:30:01 AM
X
In reply to:
Peter something
@Petersumthing
·
580d
@mtaibbi So, you don't deny the article was widely criticized for its "overly graphic and disturbing content"?! 🤣
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
580d
So there’s no mention of the Koch Brothers in “Great American Bubble Machine” (or Griftopia, which reprints the article) and I never, ever mentioned the “Compton Pledge” anywhere. There are no “fictitious scenarios” in the Goldman article either.
Peter something
@Petersumthing
·
580d
@mtaibbi Gemini is now trying to walk it back:

The conversation appears to be a discussion about an article and its content, with one user questioning the denial of criticism and another responding with skepticism. The tone is conversational and includes elements of humor and sarcasm. The content involves a critique of media reporting and the accuracy of information presented in an article.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not seem to cause harm but is part of a critical discussion on the content of an article. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not reveal personal information or engage in harassment. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a dialogue with those in disagreement, although it uses sarcasm, which may not be the most constructive approach.
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The user is using their platform to engage in a discussion about media integrity, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for accurate reporting. [+1]