The statement questions the lack of transparency in political processes and suggests that righteousness should not require concealment. It is critical in tone and implies that hiding information is indicative of a lack of integrity.
- The statement is critical but does not seem to intend harm. It raises a valid point about transparency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in dialogue by questioning the actions of others, which could be seen as an attempt at constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by using the platform to question and hold accountable the actions of political entities. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.