In reply to:
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
708d
The statement is a call to action against what the author perceives as support for genocide by the current administration and Congress. It uses strong language to condemn the actions of political figures and encourages voters to pledge against pro-genocide candidates. The tone is urgent and accusatory, and the content is politically charged and controversial.
- The statement uses harsh language that could be seen as harmful, particularly the use of terms like 'Genocide Joe' and 'congressional criminals'. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals but attacks the dignity of specific political figures. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards the individuals it names, but it may aim to promote empathy for the victims of the conflict. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather uses accusatory language. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence for what it perceives as the betterment of society by stopping support for genocide. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses free speech to express a strong political stance, but the language used may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its accusatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.