Mike Johnson

The statement is critical and assigns blame for the perceived immigration issues to the current administration. It is a succinct expression of disapproval regarding the handling of border policy.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement may be seen as harsh but does not directly cause harm. It is a political critique, which is a normal part of democratic discourse.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals by not targeting any specific individuals outside of their public roles. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, but rather assigns blame. It lacks a constructive approach to the issue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but is a pointed criticism without offering solutions. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of a mistake to acknowledge or correct.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The influence is used to highlight a perceived policy failure, which could be seen as an attempt to motivate change, but it does not provide constructive suggestions.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech principles by expressing a political opinion responsibly. [+1]