Matt Taibbi

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 13
3/1/2024, 5:18:27 AM
X
In reply to:
Physiocrates
@BTCTalks
·
578d
@mtaibbi Cite please?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
578d
Comments like this fascinate me. Who cares which Twitter account or even what newspaper published the numbers? The poll’s results are what they are — and incidentally, the original source is a CNN exit poll. Does it make a difference now?
The Leftorium
@obijohnkenobi11
·
578d
@mtaibbi Damn Matt Taibbi boosting a "Washington Examiner" chart without context from Sargon of Akkad... just hope all the sweet substack $ is worth it for this right-wing garbage

The statement in question is a part of a conversation regarding the source and credibility of a poll's results. The user is providing a link to the original source of the poll data in response to a request for citation. The tone is informative and the intent is to clarify and contribute to the accuracy of the information being discussed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it provides factual information and contributes to an informed discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The user is promoting understanding by providing the source of the data, which can help others verify the information. [+1]
  3. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The user is engaging in constructive dialogue by responding to a request for citation, which is a correction of the information flow in the conversation. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The user uses their influence to contribute positively to the conversation by providing accurate information. [+1]