The statement 'Do you want a list of all the mainstream news agencies that have interviewed Putin? Is your Google hand broken?' is sarcastic and dismissive in tone. It implies that the person being addressed is either unaware of the information or not making an effort to find it themselves. The statement 'She defended Tucker who was a huge purveyor of disinformation and who decided to interview mass murderer Putin. I’m sorry, I don’t get how this is something to support' expresses disapproval of the actions of a media figure and questions the support for such actions.
- The statement is dismissive and could be seen as mildly harmful in its sarcastic tone. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not directly violate privacy or dignity, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and does not promote understanding. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, as it does not contribute positively to the discourse. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.