Matt Taibbi

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 13
3/3/2024, 11:59:18 PM
X
In reply to:
Pil Roberts | Conservative (aka Classical Liberal)
@PilRoberts
·
574d
@mtaibbi Denying ‘conspiracy theories’ is now the conspiracy…
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
574d
I love it when people call me a conspiracy theorist. Which conspiracy theory? Do you mean the ones I didn’t fall for, like Russiagate?
NKriss
@NTKriss
·
574d
@mtaibbi @laralogan She's been denounced because, like you, she's become a nutjob conspiracy theorist who even other right-wingers can't handle.
https://www.theguardian.com/medi…

The statement '@PilRoberts Exactly' is a response in a thread discussing the labeling of individuals as conspiracy theorists and the implications of such labels in the context of media and public discourse. The tone of the statement is agreeable, indicating concurrence with the previous comment that denying 'conspiracy theories' is now considered a conspiracy. The content is minimal and does not provide a detailed argument or position but rather shows alignment with the sentiment expressed by @PilRoberts. The statement is conversational and does not appear to be harmful, disrespectful, or promote misunderstanding. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, nor does it provide constructive criticism or dialogue. It does not correct any mistakes, use influence for societal betterment, or touch upon the principles of free speech and responsible platform use.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it is a simple agreement with no negative content. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not target any individuals with harmful content. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement is neutral and does not hinder understanding, empathy, or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for societal betterment.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement is neutral regarding the use of free speech and responsible platform use.