Matt Taibbi

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score 13
3/4/2024, 2:09:22 AM
X
In reply to:
Keke P. Maus ✝️🇺🇸🌚
@MausKeke
·
573d
@mtaibbi Every single thing on this list is true. That counts as collusion no matter how you cut it. They let him go.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
573d
Adam Schiff lied about having “more than circumstantial” evidence of collusion; read the phony Steele Dossier into the congressional record; was exposed by the IG re the Nunes memo; was told by Twitter #releasethememo was not a Russian campaign and claimed it was anyway. More?
Brian Krassenstein
@krassenstein
·
574d
I’m tired of Republicans pretending that Trump had no ties to Russia and that Adam Schiff is a liar. I’m sure a million trolls will jump in on this but I don’t care.

FACTS about the Trump Campaign's Russian ties.

- High-Level Contacts: Members of the Trump campaign, including…

The statement '@MausKeke What exactly was true? Show us.' is a request for evidence or clarification in response to a claim that 'Every single thing on this list is true.' The tone is inquisitive and challenges the previous assertion, seeking substantiation for the claims made. The conversation is part of a larger debate regarding political figures and alleged collusion, which is a contentious and polarizing topic. The statement does not contain any harmful, disrespectful, or harassing content, but it does engage in the dialogue by asking for proof, which is a part of constructive criticism and dialogue.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement promotes dialogue by asking for evidence to support a claim, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  2. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement seeks to correct potential misinformation by asking for clarification, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]