The statement is a critique of a judicial decision, implying it was influenced by partisan bias rather than legal reasoning. It addresses the issue of judicial impartiality and the role of courts in democratic processes, which are matters of public concern.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words and actions, but it does accuse a court of partisanship, which could be seen as harmful to the institution's reputation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others; it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is accusatory and does not seek to understand the court's decision from a legal standpoint. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but borders on a personal attack against the integrity of the Colorado Supreme Court, which could be seen as not entirely constructive. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived injustices, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society by calling for judicial impartiality. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but may not use the platform with full integrity if the accusations are unfounded.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.